. American bee journal. La cultura delle api; le api. 598 AMERICAN BEE JOURNAu. ii^"^*^4< differenza di uova di Impreg- tramite NAT Queen e una vergine. Query 843.-1. Sono le uova in un impreg- regina tramite NAT differenti in alcun modo da quelli di una vergine ? 2. Se non, come si fa a account per pelli impure fuchi quando questi queens sono accoppiati con i fuchi di una corsa differente ? 3. Se le uova sono in una condizione diversa e quindi non la teoria della partenogenesi, come applicato alla regina-API, la caduta a terra ?-P. R. O. non so.-James A. verde. Lascio questo per il prof. Cuocere a dirci.- Sig.ra J. N. riscaldatore. 1. Sì, sono

• Collaboratore: Library Book Collection / Alamy Foto Stock
• ID dell’immagine: RPNP5H
• Dimensioni dei file: 7,2 MB (401,7 KB Download compresso)
• Liberatorie: Modello - no | Proprietà - no
• Dimensioni: 2075 x 1205 px | 35,1 x 20,4 cm | 13,8 x 8 inches | 150dpi

Altre informazioni

Questa foto è un'immagine di pubblico dominio, il che significa che il copyright è scaduto o che il titolare del copyright ha rinunciato a tale diritto. Alamy addebita un costo per l'accesso alla copia ad alta risoluzione dell'immagine.

Questa immagine potrebbe avere delle imperfezioni perché è storica o di reportage.

. American bee journal. Bee culture; Bees. 598 AMERICAN BEE JOURNAu. ii^«^*^4< Difference in Eggs of Impreg- nated Queen and a Virgin. Query 843.—1. Are the eggs in an impreg- nated queen different in any way from those of a virgin ? 2. If not, how do you account for impure drones when these queens are mated with drones of a different race ? 3. If the eggs are in a different condition, then does not the theory of parthenogenesis, as applied to queen-bees, fall to the ground ?—P. R. O. I do not know.—James A. Green. I leave this for Prof. Cook to tell us.— Mrs. J. N. Heater. 1. Yes, they are fertilized. 2 and 3. Too deep for me.—Eugene Secor. 1. No. 2. Don't know. 3. It cer- tainly would seem so.—C. H. Dibbern. This question is too much for me. I am not posted, in practice.—E. France. 1. I have failed to see any difference. 2. Your queen may be impure.—H. D. Cutting. 1. Not while in the apiary. 2. I don't account for it, neither do I believe it.— C. C. Miller. The drone eggs are not affected by the impregnation of the queen. If the queen is pure blooded, drones reared by her will be pure also.—Mrs. L. Harri- son. 1. The worker eggs are different, be- ing impregnated, the drone eggs are not. 2. If the drones are impure, it is because their mother is impure. 3. Bosh.—R. L. Taylor. 1. I am not aware that the eggs in an impregnated queen are different from those in a virgin, until the eggs are changed by contact with the impregnat- ing fluid. This answers 2 and 3.—A. B. Mason. Without going into detail, I would say that I consider the drones from a mis- mated queen pure enough for all prac- tical purposes ; but for " breeding to the feather, " I should want the drones to come from a queen which had mated with a drone of her own strain of "blood."—G. M. Doolittle. 1. There is no difference until after they are fertilized. 2. If the queen is full-blood—pure—her drones will be pure, although she may have met an im- pure d

Parole chiave associate all'immagine

• bo
• bookcentury1800
• bookdecade1860
• booksubjectbees
• bookyear1861