. Cranberries; : la nazionale rivista di mirtillo palustre. Mirtilli rossi. Problema di maggio 1974 / Volume 39 - n. 1 INDEPENDENT BUSINESS SI SENTE OSHA dovrebbe essere modificato in nessun datore di lavoro ha occhi nel retro della sua testa. Questo fatto fisiologico è senza dubbio il motivo per cui il 89 per cento degli uomini d affari indipendenti interrogata dalla National Federation of Independent Business support una fattura da Congressman Marvin Esch del Michigan per modificare la sicurezza sul lavoro e la salute di agire. Come la legge scritti da rappresentante William Steiger di Wisconsin e il senatore Harrison Williams, Jr. è stato superato, si prevede che le utilizzano

• Collaboratore: The Book Worm / Alamy Foto Stock
• ID dell’immagine: RE68W0
• Dimensioni dei file: 7,1 MB (247 KB Download compresso)
• Liberatorie: Modello - no | Proprietà - no
• Dimensioni: 2000 x 1249 px | 33,9 x 21,1 cm | 13,3 x 8,3 inches | 150dpi

Altre informazioni

Questa foto è un'immagine di pubblico dominio, il che significa che il copyright è scaduto o che il titolare del copyright ha rinunciato a tale diritto. Alamy addebita un costo per l'accesso alla copia ad alta risoluzione dell'immagine.

Questa immagine potrebbe avere delle imperfezioni perché è storica o di reportage.

. Cranberries; : the national cranberry magazine. Cranberries. Issue of May 1974 / Volume 39 - No. 1 INDEPENDENT BUSINESS FEELS OSHA SHOULD BE AMENDED No employer has eyes in the back of his head. This physiological fact is undoubtedly the reason why 89 per cent of the independent business people polled by the National Federation of Independent Business support a bill by Congressman Marvin Esch of Michigan to amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act. As the law authored by Representative William Steiger of Wisconsin and Senator Harrison Williams, Jr. was passed, it provides that the employer is to be cited and fined for violations of the safety code devised by the Department of Labor committed by i an employee. The Esch bill would give employers the opportun- i ity to defend themselves when a Labor Department • inspector found such a violation. Under the present method of administering the law, the Labor Depart- i ment is supposed to crack down on employers if any violation is found during an unannounced inspection. There have been numerous instances cited to NFIB where an employee failed to use prescribed safety equipment, or violated the procedures established by the employer. However, the employee is not held liable but the employer is cited and usually fined. There has also been other instances where the Labor Department regulations, in the opinion of the workers, creates a greater hazard to their personal safety, with the result they have refused to abide by them. This, of course, places the employer in jeopardy. The Labor Department so far has refused to recognize any responsibility on the part of the employee, taking the position that the employer has full responsibility for the conduct of the employee. Returns from 16, 280 independent firms to the continuous field survey in February show that 7.2 per cent of all respondents report they have been inspected. The most interesting figure from the computers is that showing 4.4 per cent of the retailers reply

Parole chiave associate all'immagine

• bookcentury1900
• bookspons