. Fioristi' review [microformati]. Floricoltura. Lampadina americano Co. 172 N. WABASH AVENUE, CHICAGO, ill. altra parte ad interesse", di rivedere i termini dei contratti e dei prezzi. La raccomandazione della Commissione, ha affermato; era basata sui seguenti costitui- clusions: 1. Che i produttori di beni identificati devono essere protetti nei loro beni immateriali di destra o di buona volontà, creato attraverso anni di fair dealing e di sus- tained qualità della merce; 2. Che il potere illimitato sia per fissare e per applicare e mantenere i prezzi di rivendita non possono essere leciti compiuti con la sicurezza; e 3. Che prezzo sfrenato-c

• Collaboratore: Library Book Collection / Alamy Foto Stock
• ID dell’immagine: RRMJDD
• Dimensioni dei file: 7,1 MB (100,9 KB Download compresso)
• Liberatorie: Modello - no | Proprietà - no
• Dimensioni: 1660 x 1505 px | 28,1 x 25,5 cm | 11,1 x 10 inches | 150dpi

Altre informazioni

Questa foto è un'immagine di pubblico dominio, il che significa che il copyright è scaduto o che il titolare del copyright ha rinunciato a tale diritto. Alamy addebita un costo per l'accesso alla copia ad alta risoluzione dell'immagine.

Questa immagine potrebbe avere delle imperfezioni perché è storica o di reportage.

. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. American Bulb Co. 172 N. WABASH AVENUE, CHICAGO, ILL. other party at interest, " to review the terms of contracts and prices. The commission's recommendation, it stated; was based on the following con- clusions: 1. That producers of identified goods should be protected in their intangible property right or good will, created through years of fair dealing and of sus- tained quality of merchandise; 2. That the unlimited power both to fix and to enforce and maintain resale prices may not be made lawful with safety; and 3. That unrestrained price-cutting is not in the public interest, and tends, in the long run, to impair, if not to destroy, the production and distribution of articles desirable to the public. SEED APPBOPRIATIONS VETOED. "When the president vetoed the agri- cultural appropriation bill July 12, be- cause it contained a repeal of the day- light saving act, he rejected at the same time the appropriations of the Depart- ment of Agriculture for the work of the bureau of markets, which has car- ried on the reporting of seed crop con- ditions. It is doubtful, even if the bill is passed with the objectionable re- peal clause omitted, as is expected, whether the bureau of markets will be able to do much towards reporting seed crop conditions during the coming year. Instead of the $150, 000 appropriated by the feed production act of November 21, 1918, the amount allotted for the coming year is $50, 000, plus $14, 880 voted for the salaries of men in this section. The difference, .$95, 120, is ap- proximately two-thirds of the original sum allowed for the work. In the vetoed bill is also the appro- priation for free seeds, amounting to $358, 980. The sum of $36, 680 was to be devoted to studying and testing com- mercial grass seeds. President Wilson's reason for reject- ing the bill was the repeal of the day- light saving contained in it. Since this clause lacked eight votes of enough to override the president's veto

Parole chiave associate all'immagine

• bookcentury1900
• bookdecad
• booksubjectfloriculture
• bookyear1912