. Studi in telai primitivi. praticamente nessuna necessità per la navetta thewarp ponderata di telaio in modo primitivo di una costruzione come quella posseduta dal earlierGreeks. Di conseguenza, tenendo conto di tutti i punti in considerazione, sembra essere ananachronism di dedurre che la navetta esisteva in omerica, o forse anche in laterGreek, volte. Che cosa è stato usato era ancora un rocchetto.1 1 Dal momento che quanto sopra è stato scritto trovo che otto Schrader (Lingu.-hist. Forschungen zurHandelsgeschiehte u. Warenhmde, Jena, 1886, p. 182), citato da Franz Stuhlrnann {EinKuhiirgeschichtlicher Ausflug in den Aures . . Amburgo, 1912,

• Collaboratore: The Reading Room / Alamy Foto Stock
• ID dell’immagine: 2AG3YD0
• Dimensioni dei file: 7,1 MB (440,4 KB Download compresso)
• Liberatorie: Modello - no | Proprietà - no
• Dimensioni: 2629 x 950 px | 22,3 x 8 cm | 8,8 x 3,2 inches | 300dpi

Altre informazioni

Questa foto è un'immagine di pubblico dominio, il che significa che il copyright è scaduto o che il titolare del copyright ha rinunciato a tale diritto. Alamy addebita un costo per l'accesso alla copia ad alta risoluzione dell'immagine.

Questa immagine potrebbe avere delle imperfezioni perché è storica o di reportage.

. Studies in primitive looms. practically no necessity, for the shuttle on thewarp-weighted loom of so primitive a construction as that possessed by the earlierGreeks. Hence, taking all the points into consideration, it appears to be ananachronism to infer that the shuttle existed in Homeric, or perhaps even in laterGreek, times. What was used was still a spool.1 1 Since the above was written I find that Otto Schrader (Lingu.-hist. Forschungen zurHandelsgeschiehte u. Warenhmde, Jena, 1886, p. 182), as quoted by Franz Stuhlrnann {EinKuhiirgeschichtlicher Ausflug in den Aures . . Hamburg, 1912, p. 195), states : Our shuttlewas unknown to the Ancients. I have not been able to see a copy of Schraders work. H. Ling Eoth.—Studies in Primitive Looms. 9 3.—The Ainu Loom. The Ainu loom is a primitive affair, with characteristics well worth studying.It has not been described before to any extent except in a very crude and unsatis-factory way by Hugo Ephraim, 1 and hence I have chosen it as a fit subject fordiscussion.. FIG. 3.—-AINU WOMAN WEAVING (After Romyn Hitchcock.) FIG. 4.—AINU WOMAN WEAVING. (As reproduced by Ephraim, after Romyn Hitch-cock. Note the distorted heddle and spool, andthe gratuitous and incorrect addition of the feet.) Both reduced by one-fourth lineal. We are told by the Eev. John Batchelor that the chief article of dress wornby the Ainu is a long garment which they call attush. This word really meanselm fibre or elm thread, and, as the words indicate, the dresses are made from theinner bark of elm-trees. Such garments are very brittle when dry, but when wetthey are exceedingly strong.2 According to MacEitchie, in the legend descriptive ofthe illustration of Ainu peeling the bark off the tree, it is Microptelea parvifolia, inAino ohiyo but Hitchcock says the people use the bark of the elm (Ulmus montana), called by them ohiyo, and sometimes U. campestris? Batchelor continues: Elm bark is peeled off the trees in early spring or autumn, just when the

Parole chiave associate all'immagine

• bookcentury1900
• bookdecade1910
• bookidstudie
• booksubjectweaving